{"id":101675,"date":"2026-09-07T12:55:32","date_gmt":"2026-09-07T12:55:32","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/optics.carritech.com\/?p=101675"},"modified":"2026-09-07T13:07:46","modified_gmt":"2026-09-07T13:07:46","slug":"qsfp-dd-vs-osfp","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/optics.carritech.com\/es\/qsfp-dd-vs-osfp\/","title":{"rendered":"QSFP-DD vs OSFP: choosing the right 400G and 800G form factor"},"content":{"rendered":"<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">If you are specifying 400G, 800G or planning a route to 1.6T, one decision shapes everything that follows: QSFP-DD or OSFP. The two form factors carry the same headline speeds, sit in similar-looking cages, and are frequently treated as interchangeable in budget spreadsheets. They are not. They differ in backwards compatibility, thermal headroom and where the industry is heading beyond 800G.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Here is the practical comparison, without the marketing.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">The short answer<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Choose QSFP-DD<\/strong> when you are upgrading an existing estate and need the new ports to keep accepting your current QSFP28 and QSFP56 optics.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Choose OSFP<\/strong> when you are building new high-density fabric \u2014 particularly AI and hyperscale east-west traffic \u2014 and want thermal and power headroom for what comes after 800G.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">In most real networks the choice is made for you by the switch you have already bought. The value in understanding the difference is in specifying the <em>optics<\/em> correctly, and in planning the next refresh.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">What they have in common<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Both are eight-lane pluggable form factors. At 400G that is 8 x 50G electrical lanes; at 800G it is 8 x 100G. Both are defined by open multi-source agreements \u2014 the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.qsfp-dd.com\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">QSFP-DD MSA<\/a> and the <a href=\"https:\/\/osfpmsa.org\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">OSFP MSA<\/a> \u2014 and both carry optical interfaces standardised by the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ieee802.org\/3\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">IEEE 802.3 Ethernet Working Group<\/a>. Both are managed through the Common Management Interface Specification, so monitoring and diagnostics behave consistently across either.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">That shared standards base is why compatible optics work reliably in both: the interfaces are public, and conformance is testable.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Backwards compatibility: QSFP-DD&#8217;s biggest advantage<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">QSFP-DD is a double-density evolution of the QSFP cage \u2014 a second row of electrical contacts added behind the first. The mechanical opening is unchanged, so a QSFP28 or QSFP56 module drops straight into a QSFP-DD port and works at its native speed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">For a brownfield estate that is enormously useful. You can populate a new 400G leaf with existing <a href=\"https:\/\/optics.carritech.com\/es\/optical-transceivers\/100g-transceivers\/\">100G optics<\/a> on day one, then migrate ports to 400G as demand arrives, without stranding inventory. OSFP ports can accept QSFP-family modules too, but only via an OSFP-to-QSFP adapter \u2014 an extra part, an extra failure point and an extra line on the bill of materials.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Thermals and power: OSFP&#8217;s biggest advantage<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">OSFP is physically slightly larger, and that space buys thermal performance. OSFP modules are commonly available with an integrated heatsink on the module body, rather than relying entirely on a riding heatsink in the host cage. As per-module power rises with higher-order modulation and longer reaches, that headroom stops being a nicety.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">QSFP-DD is not thermally incapable \u2014 well-designed hosts run 400G and 800G QSFP-DD reliably in dense configurations \u2014 but it works harder to do it, and switch vendors are more likely to publish population rules or airflow constraints for fully loaded QSFP-DD line cards. If you are filling every port in a hot aisle, ask for those figures before you commit.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Looking past 800G<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Both MSAs have published routes to 1.6T. OSFP has been favoured in early AI-cluster deployments, where power budgets per port are high and vendors have leaned on its thermal envelope; OSFP-XD extends the lane count for higher aggregate rates. QSFP-DD&#8217;s roadmap continues through higher-rate variants that preserve the cage&#8217;s compatibility story.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The honest position for most operators: neither form factor is going away, and the market has settled into a split where enterprise and telecom refreshes lean QSFP-DD while AI fabric leans OSFP. Plan for both existing in your estate rather than betting on one winning. Our <a href=\"https:\/\/optics.carritech.com\/es\/1-6t-transceivers\/\">1.6T transceivers<\/a> y <a href=\"https:\/\/optics.carritech.com\/es\/optical-transceivers\/800g-transceivers\/\">800G range<\/a> cover both paths.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Side by side<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table\"><table>\n<thead><tr><th>&nbsp;<\/th><th>QSFP-DD<\/th><th>OSFP<\/th><\/tr><\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr><td>Electrical lanes<\/td><td>8<\/td><td>8 (16 on OSFP-XD)<\/td><\/tr>\n<tr><td>Accepts QSFP28\/QSFP56 directly<\/td><td>Yes<\/td><td>Adapter required<\/td><\/tr>\n<tr><td>Module size<\/td><td>QSFP footprint<\/td><td>Slightly larger<\/td><\/tr>\n<tr><td>Integrated heatsink option<\/td><td>Host cage \/ riding heatsink<\/td><td>Commonly on module<\/td><\/tr>\n<tr><td>Typical strength<\/td><td>Brownfield upgrades, mixed-speed ports<\/td><td>AI and hyperscale fabric, high power budgets<\/td><\/tr>\n<tr><td>Speeds in the Carritech range<\/td><td>200G, 400G<\/td><td>800G, 1.6T<\/td><\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">What to check before you order<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<ol class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>The host port type<\/strong>, not the speed. A &#8220;400G port&#8221; tells you nothing about the cage.<\/li>\n<li><strong>The optical interface<\/strong> \u2014 DR4, FR4, LR4, SR8 and so on determine reach and fibre type, and are chosen independently of the form factor.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Breakout intentions.<\/strong> If you plan to break 400G out to 4 x 100G, confirm the host supports it on that port and specify the right cable or module set.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Coding.<\/strong> The module must identify itself correctly to the host platform.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Fibre and polarity.<\/strong> Multi-lane parallel optics use MPO; if polarity is not something you have pinned down, read our guide to <a href=\"https:\/\/optics.carritech.com\/es\/mpo-polarity\/\">MPO polarity types A, B and C<\/a>.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">For short in-rack connections at these speeds, a passive <a href=\"https:\/\/optics.carritech.com\/es\/dac-cables\/\">DAC<\/a> or an <a href=\"https:\/\/optics.carritech.com\/es\/active-optical-cable-aoc\/\">AOC<\/a> is often the better answer than a pair of modules \u2014 our comparison of <a href=\"https:\/\/optics.carritech.com\/es\/dac-vs-aoc\/\">DAC vs AOC<\/a> covers where each one wins.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Getting the right module first time<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Carritech Optics supplies compatible <a href=\"https:\/\/optics.carritech.com\/es\/optical-transceivers\/400g-transceivers\/\">400G QSFP-DD<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/optics.carritech.com\/es\/optical-transceivers\/800g-transceivers\/\">800G OSFP<\/a> y <a href=\"https:\/\/optics.carritech.com\/es\/1-6t-transceivers\/\">1.6T<\/a> optics, tested against the platforms they are going into and backed by a lifetime warranty. If you have an OEM part number in hand, our <a href=\"https:\/\/optics.carritech.com\/es\/optical-transceivers\/compatibility-check\/\">compatibility checker<\/a> returns the tested equivalent in seconds.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Not sure which way your next refresh should go? Send us the switch models and port counts and we will spec it \u2014 <a href=\"https:\/\/optics.carritech.com\/es\/request-quote\/\">request a quote<\/a>.<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Same headline speeds, very different decisions. QSFP-DD vs OSFP compared on electrical lanes, thermal headroom, backwards compatibility and the roadmap past 800G &#8211; plus the five things to check before you order.<\/p>","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":101682,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1701,227,233,1702,171],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-101675","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-1-6t","category-400g","category-800g","category-guide","category-optical-transceivers"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v28.4 (Yoast SEO v28.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>QSFP-DD vs OSFP: Which 400G\/800G Form Factor?<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"QSFP-DD vs OSFP compared on lanes, power, thermals and backwards compatibility, so you specify the right 400G, 800G or 1.6T optics first time.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/optics.carritech.com\/es\/qsfp-dd-vs-osfp\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"es_ES\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"QSFP-DD vs OSFP: choosing the right 400G and 800G form factor\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"QSFP-DD vs OSFP compared on lanes, power, thermals and backwards compatibility, so you specify the right 400G, 800G or 1.6T optics first time.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/optics.carritech.com\/es\/qsfp-dd-vs-osfp\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Carritech Optics\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-09-07T12:55:32+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-09-07T13:07:46+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/optics.carritech.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/ChatGPT-Image-Sep-7-2026-02_07_14-PM.png\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1672\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"941\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/png\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Escrito por\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Tiempo de lectura\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutos\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/optics.carritech.com\\\/qsfp-dd-vs-osfp\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/optics.carritech.com\\\/qsfp-dd-vs-osfp\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/optics.carritech.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/00fd2c4f332d754325cad053cd4a8a9d\"},\"headline\":\"QSFP-DD vs OSFP: choosing the right 400G and 800G form factor\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-09-07T12:55:32+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-09-07T13:07:46+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/optics.carritech.com\\\/qsfp-dd-vs-osfp\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":868,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/optics.carritech.com\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/optics.carritech.com\\\/qsfp-dd-vs-osfp\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/optics.carritech.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/09\\\/ChatGPT-Image-Sep-7-2026-02_07_14-PM.png\",\"articleSection\":[\"1.6T\",\"400G\",\"800G\",\"Guide\",\"Optical Transceivers\"],\"inLanguage\":\"es\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/optics.carritech.com\\\/qsfp-dd-vs-osfp\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/optics.carritech.com\\\/qsfp-dd-vs-osfp\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/optics.carritech.com\\\/qsfp-dd-vs-osfp\\\/\",\"name\":\"QSFP-DD vs OSFP: Which 400G\\\/800G Form Factor?\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/optics.carritech.com\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/optics.carritech.com\\\/qsfp-dd-vs-osfp\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/optics.carritech.com\\\/qsfp-dd-vs-osfp\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/optics.carritech.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/09\\\/ChatGPT-Image-Sep-7-2026-02_07_14-PM.png\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-09-07T12:55:32+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-09-07T13:07:46+00:00\",\"description\":\"QSFP-DD vs OSFP compared on lanes, power, thermals and backwards compatibility, so you specify the right 400G, 800G or 1.6T optics first time.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/optics.carritech.com\\\/qsfp-dd-vs-osfp\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"es\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/optics.carritech.com\\\/qsfp-dd-vs-osfp\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"es\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/optics.carritech.com\\\/qsfp-dd-vs-osfp\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/optics.carritech.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/09\\\/ChatGPT-Image-Sep-7-2026-02_07_14-PM.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/optics.carritech.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/09\\\/ChatGPT-Image-Sep-7-2026-02_07_14-PM.png\",\"width\":1672,\"height\":941,\"caption\":\"400g-vs-800g-transceviers\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/optics.carritech.com\\\/qsfp-dd-vs-osfp\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/optics.carritech.com\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"QSFP-DD vs OSFP: choosing the right 400G and 800G form factor\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/optics.carritech.com\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/optics.carritech.com\\\/\",\"name\":\"Carritech Optics\",\"description\":\"High Quality Optical Transceivers\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/optics.carritech.com\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Carritech Optics\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/optics.carritech.com\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"es\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/optics.carritech.com\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Carritech Optics\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/optics.carritech.com\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"es\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/optics.carritech.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/optics.carritech.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/Carritech-optics.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/optics.carritech.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/Carritech-optics.png\",\"width\":2048,\"height\":681,\"caption\":\"Carritech Optics\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/optics.carritech.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/optics.carritech.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/00fd2c4f332d754325cad053cd4a8a9d\",\"name\":\"admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"es\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1ab96350f6268bdc63743a0e3954a16bbe6c9e815fe11a0cde9e8ae7591816b5?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1ab96350f6268bdc63743a0e3954a16bbe6c9e815fe11a0cde9e8ae7591816b5?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1ab96350f6268bdc63743a0e3954a16bbe6c9e815fe11a0cde9e8ae7591816b5?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/optics.carritech.com\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/optics.carritech.com\\\/es\\\/author\\\/youbiquity\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"QSFP-DD vs OSFP: Which 400G\/800G Form Factor?","description":"QSFP-DD vs OSFP compared on lanes, power, thermals and backwards compatibility, so you specify the right 400G, 800G or 1.6T optics first time.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/optics.carritech.com\/es\/qsfp-dd-vs-osfp\/","og_locale":"es_ES","og_type":"article","og_title":"QSFP-DD vs OSFP: choosing the right 400G and 800G form factor","og_description":"QSFP-DD vs OSFP compared on lanes, power, thermals and backwards compatibility, so you specify the right 400G, 800G or 1.6T optics first time.","og_url":"https:\/\/optics.carritech.com\/es\/qsfp-dd-vs-osfp\/","og_site_name":"Carritech Optics","article_published_time":"2026-09-07T12:55:32+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-09-07T13:07:46+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1672,"height":941,"url":"https:\/\/optics.carritech.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/ChatGPT-Image-Sep-7-2026-02_07_14-PM.png","type":"image\/png"}],"author":"admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Escrito por":"admin","Tiempo de lectura":"4 minutos"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/optics.carritech.com\/qsfp-dd-vs-osfp\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/optics.carritech.com\/qsfp-dd-vs-osfp\/"},"author":{"name":"admin","@id":"https:\/\/optics.carritech.com\/#\/schema\/person\/00fd2c4f332d754325cad053cd4a8a9d"},"headline":"QSFP-DD vs OSFP: choosing the right 400G and 800G form factor","datePublished":"2026-09-07T12:55:32+00:00","dateModified":"2026-09-07T13:07:46+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/optics.carritech.com\/qsfp-dd-vs-osfp\/"},"wordCount":868,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/optics.carritech.com\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/optics.carritech.com\/qsfp-dd-vs-osfp\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/optics.carritech.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/ChatGPT-Image-Sep-7-2026-02_07_14-PM.png","articleSection":["1.6T","400G","800G","Guide","Optical Transceivers"],"inLanguage":"es","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/optics.carritech.com\/qsfp-dd-vs-osfp\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/optics.carritech.com\/qsfp-dd-vs-osfp\/","url":"https:\/\/optics.carritech.com\/qsfp-dd-vs-osfp\/","name":"QSFP-DD vs OSFP: Which 400G\/800G Form Factor?","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/optics.carritech.com\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/optics.carritech.com\/qsfp-dd-vs-osfp\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/optics.carritech.com\/qsfp-dd-vs-osfp\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/optics.carritech.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/ChatGPT-Image-Sep-7-2026-02_07_14-PM.png","datePublished":"2026-09-07T12:55:32+00:00","dateModified":"2026-09-07T13:07:46+00:00","description":"QSFP-DD vs OSFP compared on lanes, power, thermals and backwards compatibility, so you specify the right 400G, 800G or 1.6T optics first time.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/optics.carritech.com\/qsfp-dd-vs-osfp\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"es","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/optics.carritech.com\/qsfp-dd-vs-osfp\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"es","@id":"https:\/\/optics.carritech.com\/qsfp-dd-vs-osfp\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/optics.carritech.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/ChatGPT-Image-Sep-7-2026-02_07_14-PM.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/optics.carritech.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/ChatGPT-Image-Sep-7-2026-02_07_14-PM.png","width":1672,"height":941,"caption":"400g-vs-800g-transceviers"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/optics.carritech.com\/qsfp-dd-vs-osfp\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/optics.carritech.com\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"QSFP-DD vs OSFP: choosing the right 400G and 800G form factor"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/optics.carritech.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/optics.carritech.com\/","name":"\u00d3ptica Carritech","description":"High Quality Optical Transceivers","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/optics.carritech.com\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Carritech Optics","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/optics.carritech.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"es"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/optics.carritech.com\/#organization","name":"\u00d3ptica Carritech","url":"https:\/\/optics.carritech.com\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"es","@id":"https:\/\/optics.carritech.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/optics.carritech.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/Carritech-optics.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/optics.carritech.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/Carritech-optics.png","width":2048,"height":681,"caption":"Carritech Optics"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/optics.carritech.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/optics.carritech.com\/#\/schema\/person\/00fd2c4f332d754325cad053cd4a8a9d","name":"admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"es","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1ab96350f6268bdc63743a0e3954a16bbe6c9e815fe11a0cde9e8ae7591816b5?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1ab96350f6268bdc63743a0e3954a16bbe6c9e815fe11a0cde9e8ae7591816b5?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1ab96350f6268bdc63743a0e3954a16bbe6c9e815fe11a0cde9e8ae7591816b5?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/optics.carritech.com"],"url":"https:\/\/optics.carritech.com\/es\/author\/youbiquity\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/optics.carritech.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/101675","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/optics.carritech.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/optics.carritech.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/optics.carritech.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/optics.carritech.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=101675"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/optics.carritech.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/101675\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":101679,"href":"https:\/\/optics.carritech.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/101675\/revisions\/101679"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/optics.carritech.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/101682"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/optics.carritech.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=101675"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/optics.carritech.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=101675"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/optics.carritech.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=101675"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}